Drawing for Serial No. 79000901

USPTO serial 79000901

Serial No. 79000901

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DWYER, JOHN D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79000901?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Billiard balls, bowling ballsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 13, 2014DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jul 12, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Aug 31, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 24, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 24, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 11, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 11, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 6, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Nov 29, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 28, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 3, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 17, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 17, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 25, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 4, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 4, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 1, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 16, 2004FAXXFAX SENT
Oct 1, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 31, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 11, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 5, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance