CopyMark Law Group
4.9
Drawing for SCORPION

USPTO serial 79000924

SCORPION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3162792Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 24, 2006
Examiner
ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCORPION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Material for stopping teeth and dental waxSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
010Surgical, medical, dental and veterinary apparatus, namely ultrasonic scalers, endodontic treatment units, air polishers, curing lights; artificial teeth; sutures; analytical apparatus for medical use, namely, flushing devices for rinsing body cavities during surgery; electrical dental apparatus, namely, electrosurgery apparatus, implantology surgical drilling units, surgical ultrasonic aspirators for human and/or veterinary use; orthodontic apparatus, namely, expansion screws, night guards; ultrasonic apparatus for dental useSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2014INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 31, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 23, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 31, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 23, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 21, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 24, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 8, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 19, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 20, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 16, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 24, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 11, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 20, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 20, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2006PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jan 20, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2005CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 30, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 30, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 3, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 22, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 20, 2005LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 18, 2005ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 6, 2005LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2005LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 17, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 12, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 11, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 27, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 2004RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 23, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance