USPTO serial 79000967
ALLIGATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2995374Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 13, 2005
- Examiner
- WHITE,RICHARD F
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with ALLIGATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Europeisk Produktutveckling AB
SE
Hergiswil, CH
Europeisk Produktutveckling AB
SE
Europeisk Produktutveckling AB
SE
Arlandastad, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Caroline E. Bryce
Caroline E. Bryce Sheridan Ross P.C.1560 Broadway, Suite 1200Denver, CO 80202United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Kitchen utensils, namely fruit- and vegetable cutters, namely, hand operated vegetable choppers, not of precious metal or coated therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Europeisk Produktutveckling AB
- Other trademarks owned by EPU AG
- Other trademarks owned by Europeisk Produktutveckling AB
- Other trademarks owned by Europeisk Produktutveckling AB
- Other trademarks owned by EPU Holding AB
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named ALLIGATOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2026 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 20, 2025 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2024 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 18, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 15, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2013 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 29, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | FINA | FINAL DISPOSITION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 16, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |