Drawing for GAMES RAFT

USPTO serial 79000972

GAMES RAFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3104090Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 13, 2006
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GAMES RAFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE 10TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Shirts, t-shirts, shorts, sweatshirts, pants, trousers, sweat pants, swim wear, robes, hats, caps, berets, masquerade costumes, beachwear, clothing for gymnastics, namely, gym suits, shorts and shirts, gymnastic shoes, sports shoes, jackets, and turbansSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
028Gymnastics and sporting equipment, namely, an inflatable platform for use as a surface for balance improvement and athletic activitiesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 16, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 22, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 22, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 30, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 18, 2013INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 18, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 24, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 12, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 5, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 23, 2006CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Aug 21, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 2, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Feb 7, 2006DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Feb 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 19, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 19, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 9, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 2, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 31, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 21, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 17, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 23, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 17, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance