Drawing for REGENT SUPERIOR PREMIUM BREW GOLD LION LAGER

USPTO serial 79001025

REGENT SUPERIOR PREMIUM BREW GOLD LION LAGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3261214Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 10, 2007
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REGENT SUPERIOR PREMIUM BREW GOLD LION LAGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Beer or Beer products, namely, beer, lager, ale, stoutSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 3, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Aug 3, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 13, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jul 13, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jul 13, 2017EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED
Jul 11, 2017PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71
Jul 9, 201771AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED
Jul 9, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jul 9, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 10, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jan 23, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Dec 8, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jun 22, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jun 22, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jun 21, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun 1, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jun 1, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 13, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 15, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 15, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Nov 7, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 10, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 2, 2007ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Apr 4, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Mar 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 14, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 12, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 9, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 9, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 7, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 6, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Nov 3, 2005CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jul 5, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 5, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jun 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 8, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 26, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 26, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 7, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 3, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 17, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 12, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance