Drawing for AQUACON

USPTO serial 79001037

AQUACON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AQUACON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Building materials made of metal, namely fasteners in particular for the connection of elements of prefabricated houses as well as accessories therefore in the nature of anchors, bolts, nails, screws; fasteners made of metal for cables and pipes in the nature of clamps, clips, fixing rails, bolts, nails, screws; fastening materials made of metal in the nature of anchors, bolts, nails, screws; couplings for water and gas conduits and for electric conductors in the nature of quick connect couplings, connectors for power and control circuits; locksmith's goods and ironmongery, namely, bolts, nails, rivets, anchors, fittings, nuts, wiresSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
020Non-metal fasteners in particular for the connection of elements of prefabricated houses as well as accessories therefore, namely, bolts, nails, plugs, rivets, screws; non-metal fasteners made of synthetics for cables and pipes, namely, clamps, clips, fixing rails, bolts, nails, screws; non-metal fastening materials made of synthetics, namely plugs, bolts, nails, screws; non-metal couplings for water and gas conduits and for electric conductors, all made wholly or partly of synthetics, namely quick connect couplings, connectors for power and control circuitsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 14, 2014DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jun 13, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Aug 17, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 28, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 28, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 20, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jan 23, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 23, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 27, 2005CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Jun 27, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED
Jun 22, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 26, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 26, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 14, 2005CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Mar 14, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED
Mar 10, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Feb 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 23, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 22, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 17, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 4, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 19, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 9, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 17, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 12, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance