USPTO serial 79001072
GLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3066087Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 7, 2006
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | DRINKS, NAMELY, WATER, SODA POPS, BEER, FRUIT JUICES, APPLE JUICE BEVERAGES, BREWED MALT-BASED ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE IN THE NATURE OF A BEER, FROZEN FRUIT BEVERAGES, FROZEN-FRUIT BASED BEVERAGES, FRUIT-FLAVORED BEVERAGES, GRAPE JUICE BEVERAGES, ICED FRUIT BEVERAGES, CARBONATED BEVERAGES, NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES CONTAINING FRUIT JUICES, NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES WITH TEA FLAVOR, NON-ALCOHOLIC MALT BEVERAGE, ORANGE JUICE BEVERAGES, PINEAPPLE JUICE BEVERAGES, SHERBETS AS BEVERAGES, SMOOTHIES AS BEVERAGES, SOY-BASED BEVERAGES NOT BEING MILK SUBSTITUTES, TOMATO JUICE BEVERAGES, VEGETABLE JUICE BEVERAGES, WHEY BEVERAGES, ALOE VERA DRINKS, COFFEE-FLAVORED SOFT DRINKS, COLAS, ENERGY DRINKS, FRUIT DRINKS, FRUIT FLAVORED SOFT DRINKS, FRUIT-BASED SOFT DRINKS FLAVORED WITH TEA, FRUIT-FLAVORED DRINKS, GUARANA DRINKS, ISOTONIC DRINKS, CARBONATED, LOW CALORIE AND NON-CARBONATED SOFT DRINKS, SOFT DRINKS FLAVORED WITH TEA, FLAVORED WATERS, SELTZER WATER, SPARKLING WATER, MINERAL WATER, AND SPORTS DRINKS; SUBSTANCES FOR MAKING DRINKS, NAMELY, SYRUPS FOR MAKING SOFT DRINKS, SYRUPS FOR MAKING FRUIT DRINKS, PREPARATIONS FOR MAKING FRUIT DRINKS, ESSENCES FOR USE IN MAKING SOFT DRINKS, NOT IN THE NATURE OF ESSENTIAL OILS, CONCENTRATES, SYRUPS OR POWDERS USED IN THE PREPARATION OF SOFT DRINKS, SYRUPS FOR MAKING WHEY-BASED BEVERAGES, SYRUPS FOR BEVERAGES, NON-ALCOHOLIC FRUIT EXTRACTS USED IN THE PREPARATION OF BEVERAGES, AND MALT SYRUP FOR BEVERAGES; INGREDIENTS AND OTHER PREPARATIONS FOR MAKING BEVERAGES, NAMELY, ESSENCES FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF LIQUEURS, ESSENCES FOR THE PREPARATION OF MINERAL WATERS, AND ESSENCES FOR USE IN MAKING SOFT DRINKS, ALL NOT IN THE NATURE OF ESSENTIAL OILS, EXTRACTS OF HOPS FOR MAKING BEER, AND EXTRACTS OF MUST, UNFERMENTED | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 033 | DRINKS, NAMELY, ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES PRODUCED FROM A BREWED MALT BASE WITH NATURAL FLAVORS, ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES OF FRUIT, ALCOHOLIC COFFEE-BASED BEVERAGE, ALCOHOLIC TEA-BASED BEVERAGE, FLAVORED BREWED MALT BEVERAGE, RUM, WINES, TONIC LIQUORS, DISTILLED SPIRITS, DISTILLED SPIRITS OF RICE, CORN OR BARLEY, POTABLE SPIRITS, WHISKEY, GIN, VODKA, TEQUILA, LIQUEURS, SPIRITOUS LIQUORS, CARBONATED BEVERAGES CONTAINING WINES AND/OR POTABLE SPIRITS, NON-CARBONATED BEVERAGES CONTAINING WINES AND/OR POTABLE SPIRITS, LOW ALCOHOL NON-CARBONATED BEVERAGES CONTAINING POTABLE SPIRITS AND/OR FRUIT JUICES, LOW ALCOHOL CARBONATED BEVERAGES WITH A WINE BASE AND/OR POTABLE SPIRITS BASE, PREPARED ALCOHOLIC COCKTAILS, PREPARED WINE COCKTAILS, AND WINE COOLERS; ALCOHOLIC EXTRACTS, NAMELY, EXTRACTS OF SPIRITOUS LIQUORS, TONIC LIQUOR CONTAINING HERB EXTRACTS, TONIC LIQUOR CONTAINING MAMUSHI-SNAKE EXTRACTS, TONIC LIQUOR FLAVORED WITH JAPANESE PLUM EXTRACTS, TONIC LIQUOR FLAVORED WITH PINE NEEDLE EXTRACTS, AND TONIC SWEET GRAPE WINE CONTAINING EXTRACTS FROM GINSENG AND CONCHONA BARK | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2014 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 29, 2014 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |