Drawing for FLIGHT GOURMET

USPTO serial 79001074

FLIGHT GOURMET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3041837Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 10, 2006
Examiner
GEORGE, DAHLIA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLIGHT GOURMET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Distribution and delivery of meals for airline catering requirementsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
043Catering, restaurant and self-service restaurant services, canteen and cafeterias services, providing of food and drink in restaurants in airports and airlines; food and drink preparation for consumption in airports and for airlinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 19, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jun 19, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 19, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Apr 17, 2013INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Aug 17, 2012C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Dec 10, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 1, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 15, 2006FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 15, 2006FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 18, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 17, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 10, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 18, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 18, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jan 10, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 18, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 28, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 25, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 23, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 19, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 15, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 12, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 11, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 11, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 8, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 8, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 8, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 4, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 4, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jul 20, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 8, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 8, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jul 8, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jan 7, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 7, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 7, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 16, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 9, 2004ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2004REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 19, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 14, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 17, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 12, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance