Drawing for ABUS

USPTO serial 79001117

ABUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2995376Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 13, 2005
Examiner
RADEMACHER,APRIL LUEDERS
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with ABUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006METAL LOCKS, NAMELY, PADLOCKS, BICYCLE PADLOCKS, PADLOCKS WITH A CASING AND BOLT; LOCKING CYLINDERS, HASPS, DOOR CHAINS, BOLTS, KEYS AND BLANKS FOR KEYS ALL MADE OF BASE METALACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jan 16, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jan 12, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Sep 8, 2025ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Sep 13, 2024REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Mar 31, 2023RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Mar 3, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 3, 2023ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS
Mar 3, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Sep 13, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Mar 29, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 25, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jun 25, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jun 19, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Mar 28, 2013RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Sep 19, 2011NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED
Sep 19, 2011NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Sep 19, 201171AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Sep 19, 201115AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED
Sep 8, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Sep 6, 2011E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED
Sep 6, 2011ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Feb 20, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Aug 31, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 26, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 25, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
May 16, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 13, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 21, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 1, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 8, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 1, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 25, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 31, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 31, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 26, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 24, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 3, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 29, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 25, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 17, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 12, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance