Drawing for AQUA WASH

USPTO serial 79001182

AQUA WASH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3133199Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 22, 2006
Examiner
PAPPAS, MATTHEW
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AQUA WASH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark D. Passler

MARK D PASSLER AKERMAN SENTERFITTPO BOX 3188WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33402-3188UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018leather and its imitations, and goods made of these materials and not included in other classes, namely, fur-skins, raw skins, rawhides, tanned leather, sponge leather sold in bulk, artificial fur sold in bulk, polyurethane leather sold in bulk, boxes made of leather for travel, bags made of leather for merchandise packaging, furniture coverings of leather, valves of leather, leather straps, animal skins, trunks and traveling bags, umbrellas, parasols and walking sticks, whips, covers for horse-saddles, pads for horse saddles, riding saddles and saddle treesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
025leather clothing, namely, leather coats, leather jackets, leather jumpers, leather skirts, leather pants, leather vests, leather hats, leather caps and leather beltsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
040treatment of materials, namely, leather treatment in the nature of skin dressing, leather staining, leather cutting, fur glossing, fur mothproofing, fur dyeing, fur conditioning, tanning, clothing dyeing and finishing, textile finishing, textile dyeing and finishing, and clothing alterationSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 22, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 22, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 14, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 29, 2013INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 29, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 14, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 14, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 22, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 30, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 10, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 7, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 4, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 3, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 3, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 27, 2006CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 25, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 3, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 2, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 18, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 18, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 9, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 8, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 29, 2005DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Jul 26, 2005DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Jul 21, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 23, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 23, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 23, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 17, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 17, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 14, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 7, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 3, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance