Drawing for MICRO SYST

USPTO serial 79001202

MICRO SYST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3129964Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 15, 2006
Examiner
SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MICRO SYST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph T. Nabor

JOSEPH T NABOR FITCH, EVEN, TABIN & FLANNERYSTE 600 120 S LA SALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60603-3406UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Measuring, monitoring and inspection apparatus, namely, USB hardware and measurement devices used in the field of electronics and computers to measure pulse signals; electronic and electromechanical apparatus, instruments and elements, namely, electronic luminescent display panels, light emitting diode displays, and liquid crystal displays; current supply apparatus, namely electrical power supplies, power controllers and voltage regulators for electric power; apparatus for recording, transmitting and reproducing sound and images, and structural or replacement parts thereof; computers; and recorded programs on magnetic media, namely operating software for each of the foregoing and USB operating softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2009DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 10, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 15, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 23, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 3, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 4, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 31, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 28, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 28, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 26, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 26, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 7, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 6, 2005DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Mar 31, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2004CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 18, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance