USPTO serial 79001232
VERITABLE EAU DE COLOGNE A LA REINE DES FLEURS L.T. PIVER 1774 MARQUE FRANCAISE DEPOSEE 90 PARIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3073672Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 28, 2006
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VERITABLE EAU DE COLOGNE A LA REINE DES FLEURS L.T. PIVER 1774 MARQUE FRANCAISE DEPOSEE 90 PARIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Eau-de-Cologne | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BREMA FRANCE
- Other trademarks owned by BREMA FRANCE
- Other trademarks owned by BREMA FRANCE
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named VERITABLE EAU DE COLOGNE A LA REINE DES FLEURS L.T. PIVER 1774 MARQUE FRANCAISE DEPOSEE 90 PARIS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2014 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 29, 2014 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 6, 2014 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 23, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2006 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2005 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |