Drawing for BIOGNOS

USPTO serial 79001255

BIOGNOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3087802Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 2, 2006
Examiner
DWYER, SEAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with BIOGNOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

FRANK P. PRESTA

Frank P. Presta Nixon & Vanderhye, P.C.901 N. Glebe Rd.11th FloorArlington, VA 22203

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009[ Computers, blank and partially blank printed circuit cards for computers, on magnetic data carriers, namely, tapes and computer programmes recorded on carriers, namely, tapes and discs for use in database management, comparative analysis, spread sheet development and calculation, word processing, application programming, and statistical analysis; electronic measuring and checking instruments, namely, for use in biological science, namely, sensors, recorders, transmitters, comparitors, calculators, meters, chromatographers, analyzers, probes, scanners, imagers, scopes, detectors, processors, calibrators, controllers, integrators, actuators, scales, counters, gauges, transponders, and timers ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Technical consulting services in the form of conformational analysis of potential ligands and molecular docking and identification of potential target proteins; technical consulting services, namely software development and creation of web services in bioinformaticsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 2, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2023RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 19, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 31, 2017INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 31, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 17, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 11, 2016NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 201615AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED—
Oct 6, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 15, 2016E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED—
May 17, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 17, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 12, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 12, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 2, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 27, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2013RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 15, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 15, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 201271.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 14, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 30, 201271AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Mar 30, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 17, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 5, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 20, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 18, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 22, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 16, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 10, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 8, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 30, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 25, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 25, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 31, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 1, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 1, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 1, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 1, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 1, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 13, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 30, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance