Drawing for MERIDOL

USPTO serial 79001272

MERIDOL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3002048Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 27, 2005
Examiner
FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
Law office

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MERIDOL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cosmetic preparations for mouth and tooth care and products in the form of pastes [, powders and rinses ] for mouth and tooth care; dentifrices and dental hygiene products, namely, tooth pastes [, tooth polishes, tooth gels, tooth powders, oral and dental rinses ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED
005[ pharmaceutical and medical products and preparations for the treatment of gingivitis; pharmaceutical products and preparations for dental and oral care; dietetic substances for medical use ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED
021[ toothbrushes, electric and non-electric, dental floss, toothpicks, implements for cleaning the interdental spaces, included in this class, namely, toothpicks, dental floss and interdental brushes ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 3, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Apr 11, 2017IRIVIRREGULARITY ON INVALIDATION RECEIVED FROM IB
Feb 4, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Feb 4, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Dec 29, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Apr 29, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Nov 20, 2014CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Mar 27, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jan 13, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Feb 11, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 11, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED
Jun 11, 201271.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED
Jun 11, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Mar 12, 201271AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED
Mar 12, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Sep 23, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 28, 2009RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Aug 31, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 5, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jun 5, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
May 25, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 27, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 5, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 15, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 25, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 23, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 17, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 12, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 1, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 7, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 14, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 29, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Mar 25, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance