Drawing for RÖSCH

USPTO serial 79001316

RÖSCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3046235Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 17, 2006
Examiner
THOMPSON, HEATHER
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with RÖSCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ian Bezpalko

Ian Bezpalko The Bezpalko Law FirmP.O. Box 7635Albuquerque, NM 87107United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, sleepwear, bathing suits, bikinis, swimwear, beachwear and homewear, namely, house dresses, house coats, dusters, caftans, robes, sweat suitsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 29, 2026ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 3, 2025NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 3, 202571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 25, 2025EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2025PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Jun 2, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 13, 2025ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 21, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 15, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 18, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
May 18, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 18, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
May 18, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 11, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 1, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 1, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 10, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 17, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 25, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 5, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 30, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 1, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 1, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 14, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 8, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 6, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 21, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 22, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 9, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 13, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance