Drawing for TAKISAWA SHANGHAI

USPTO serial 79001429

TAKISAWA SHANGHAI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 401
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
JACKSON, STEVEN W
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TAKISAWA SHANGHAI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Lathes (machine tools); computer numerical control lathes; gantry loaders; drilling machines; milling machines; centering machines; grinding machines; drilling centers; machining centers; lifting apparatus; machine tools and robots (machines)ACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 22, 2008IRFIIRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB
Nov 24, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 22, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 16, 2007DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 5, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 5, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2006PGOAPETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION
Mar 17, 2006PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER
Mar 17, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Mar 2, 2006PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED
Feb 7, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Feb 7, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Feb 7, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Feb 7, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Jan 18, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 18, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 30, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 8, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 8, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 18, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 24, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Sep 1, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 1, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 19, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 13, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 9, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance