Drawing for VIE

USPTO serial 79001442

VIE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Hydraulic circuits for vehicles; clutches, for land vehicles; brakes for vehicles; electric vehicles; wheel hubs (Bands for -); propulsion mechanisms for land vehicles; driving motors for land vehicles; transmissions, for land vehicles; wheels (Spoke clips for -); segments (Brake -) for vehicles; air bags [safety devices for automobiles]; vehicle petrol [gas] tanks (Caps for -); trailer hitches for vehicles; shock absorbers for automobiles; anti-theft devices for vehicles; vehicle suspension springs; vehicle wheels (Hubs for -); shoes (Brake -), for vehicles; tipping apparatus, parts of trucks and waggonsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2014DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Oct 2, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 31, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
May 11, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 24, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 21, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 3, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 3, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 29, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 30, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 13, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 9, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance