Drawing for 3SQM

USPTO serial 79001449

3SQM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3073674Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 28, 2006
Examiner
CLARKE, NANCY
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 3SQM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Test equipment, namely computer hardware and software for determining the quality of communication devices, all of the afore-mentioned goods solely for the direct sale of these goods to network equipment manufacturers and telecom operators for designing and developing communication devicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
042services of engineers, namely determining the quality of communication devices by means of measurement technologySECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Aug 10, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 19, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 12, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jun 12, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jun 12, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
May 21, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Mar 28, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jan 30, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Dec 16, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 16, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 9, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Jun 9, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jun 8, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Mar 1, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Mar 1, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Nov 2, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 25, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 25, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 19, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 28, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 3, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 10, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 10, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 8, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 18, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 5, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 5, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Oct 4, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Oct 3, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Sep 30, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Sep 30, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 8, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 8, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 5, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 5, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 9, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Feb 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 25, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Oct 7, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 3, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 13, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 9, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance