USPTO serial 79001511
YERBAMATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOKOLS, GWEN P
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with YERBAMATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Soaps, shaving creams, after-shaves, also in cream form; bubble baths, shampoos, lotions, essential oils, perfumes in liquid and solid form and as creams; perfumed bath oils, eau de toilette and eau de cologne, extracts for handkerchiefs, perfumes and scented waters, deodorants for personal use, incense, balms | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2012 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 11, 2006 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |