USPTO serial 79001538
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Tokyo 161-0033, JP
Tokyo, JP
Tokyo 161-0033, JP
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | [ Hair dye, hair color, hair colorant, hair lotion, hair waving preparations, ] hair spray, hair wax, [ hair conditioner, hair shampoo, hair rinse, ] hair cream [ ; perfume ] | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2026 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 9, 2025 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 24, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 8, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2012 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 10, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |