USPTO serial 79001558
VITACEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3029247Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 13, 2005
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with VITACEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
J. Rettenmaier & Söhne GmbH & Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by J. Rettenmaier & Söhne GmbH & Co. KG
J. Rettenmaier & Söhne GmbH & Co. KG
Rosenberg, DE
Other trademarks owned by J. Rettenmaier & Söhne GmbH & Co. KG
J. Rettenmaier & Söhne GmbH & Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by J. Rettenmaier & Söhne GmbH & Co. KG
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Cellulose and botanical cereal and rice fiber extracts for use in making foodstuffs | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Processed vegetables sold as edible fibre | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Processed cereal and rice parings for use as dietary fiber and as additives to other foods | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | [ Fibers from cereal and rice parings for use as animal feed and foodstuffs, and as nutritional additives in the production of animal feed and foodstuffs ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by J. Rettenmaier & Söhne GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by J. Rettenmaier & Söhne GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by J. Rettenmaier & Söhne GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named VITACEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2026 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 5, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2025 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2025 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2025 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2025 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2025 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2025 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 21, 2025 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2024 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 4, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |