USPTO serial 79001635
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
A-9330 Treibach-Althofen, AT
A-9330 Treibach-Althofen, AT
A-9330 Treibach-Althofen, AT
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical products, namely ferrovanadium, ferromolybdenum, carbides, borides, nitrides, rare earths, rare earth oxides, rare earth compounds, vanadium chemicals, metal hydrides for the storage of hydrogen, mixed metal oxides, flints, ceramic powders, top slags, niobates, titanates, cobaltates, manganates, tungstates, zirconates, nickelates, chromites, ferrites, aluminates, for industrial, scientific and agricultural purposes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 006 | Base metals and the alloys thereof | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Goods made of ceramics, in particular, porcelain and crockery, namely ceramic grinding beads | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 29, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 6, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 7, 2014 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |