Drawing for TREIBACHER

USPTO serial 79001635

TREIBACHER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3041844Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 10, 2006
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TREIBACHER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leonard R. Svensson

LEONARD R SVENSSON BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH LLPPO BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical products, namely ferrovanadium, ferromolybdenum, carbides, borides, nitrides, rare earths, rare earth oxides, rare earth compounds, vanadium chemicals, metal hydrides for the storage of hydrogen, mixed metal oxides, flints, ceramic powders, top slags, niobates, titanates, cobaltates, manganates, tungstates, zirconates, nickelates, chromites, ferrites, aluminates, for industrial, scientific and agricultural purposesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
006Base metals and the alloys thereofSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
021Goods made of ceramics, in particular, porcelain and crockery, namely ceramic grinding beadsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 29, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 6, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 25, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 4, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 29, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 29, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 13, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 7, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 9, 2013INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 9, 2012C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 5, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 18, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 10, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 10, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 18, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 28, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 5, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 27, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 23, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 22, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 26, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 2, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 5, 2005DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Apr 4, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 7, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 10, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2004CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 27, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance