CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for FRESH & CO.

USPTO serial 79001679

FRESH & CO.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3041849Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 10, 2006
Examiner
ENGEL, MICHAEL
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRESH & CO.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David G. Oberdick, Esquire

DAVID G OBERDICK ESQ / CHRISTIAN M BES MEYER, UNKOVIC & SCOTT LLP1300 OLIVER BLDGPITTSBURGH, PA 15222-2304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, fruit-flavored beverages, fruit drinks, fruit nectars and fruit juices; syrups, fruit nectars, fruit drinks, fruit juices used in the preparation of fruit juices and fruit beveragesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
035Import-export agenciesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 11, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 23, 2013INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 23, 2012C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 15, 2012RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 28, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 21, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 21, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 18, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 10, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 16, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 16, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 18, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 28, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 2, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 2, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 24, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 22, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 1, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 31, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 29, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 9, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 3, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 27, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance