USPTO serial 79001698
INCOREZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INCOREZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CH
CH
CH
GB
GB
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Resins; paint additives; water repellents; plastics; all included in this class, but not including any such goods being binding agents, binding materials, moulding compounds or tackifiers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sika AG
- Other trademarks owned by Sika Technology AG
- Other trademarks owned by Sika Technology AG
- Other trademarks owned by Industrial Copolymers Limited
- Other trademarks owned by INCOREZ LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named INCOREZ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 16, 2020 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 14, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 14, 2009 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 18, 2006 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |