USPTO serial 79001776
Serial No. 79001776
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 79001776?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-74167 Neckarsulm, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Plastic packaging, namely-- plastic trays with separate wells for food products for use in the food industry | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, dned and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies; jams; compotes; milk and milk products, namely butter milk, condensed milk, cream for coffee, cream cheese, cream cheese spreads, cheese, yogurt, fruit yogurt, frozen yogurt, butter, fresh cream, sour cream, cream, curd, curd preparations, namely curd with herbsi fruits or vegetables; kefir; desserts made from yogurt, milk, curd and/or cream; meat, fish, fruit and vegetable preserves; ready-to-serve meals comprising meat, fish, and/or vegetables | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Cereal preparations, namely; granola, breakfast cereals, oat flakes, processed cereals, edible ices; honey; treacle; sauces for use as condiments, ready-to-serve meals comprising cereals, bread and pastry | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2014 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2014 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 17, 2007 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 13, 2005 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2005 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |