Drawing for XAL

USPTO serial 79001781

XAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Regulating and control apparatus and instruments for lighting installations, namely electric switches, integrated circuits and electric dimmersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
011Lighting installations, namely, electric lighting fixtures, lamps, electric bulbs, luminaries and lights diffusersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 9, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 14, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 26, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Apr 24, 2014CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Apr 21, 2014CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Apr 10, 2014CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Apr 10, 2014CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Jan 10, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Feb 16, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jul 20, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 21, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 21, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 17, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 17, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 19, 2005CRMLCORRESPONDENCE MAILED
Oct 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 13, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 30, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 23, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 23, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 22, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 22, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 30, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 9, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2005DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jan 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 30, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Dec 30, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 9, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 16, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 28, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 23, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance