CopyMark Law Group
4.9
Drawing for MAPFRE

USPTO serial 79001819

MAPFRE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3247671Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 29, 2007
Examiner
WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with MAPFRE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Assistance with this Renewal
Trademark Monitoring(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038[ telecommunications consultation ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
039ambulance transport; hired car transport; [ delivery, packaging and storage of consumer goods; ] coordinating travel arrangements for individuals and for groupsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 29, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 11, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2020CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Dec 10, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 9, 2018XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 9, 2018XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Feb 28, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 28, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 28, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 30, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 23, 2017CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Jan 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 29, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 30, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 17, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 20, 2014INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 20, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2013C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 19, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 28, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
May 28, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 1, 2013CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 22, 2013CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 14, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 30, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 30, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 22, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 29, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 25, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 23, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 22, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 1, 2006CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 1, 2006GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2006CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Nov 29, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 17, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 17, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 28, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 13, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 13, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 6, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 4, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 6, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 6, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 3, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance