Drawing for PATHWAY TO GLORY

USPTO serial 79001856

PATHWAY TO GLORY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3068352Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 14, 2006
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PATHWAY TO GLORY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karin Segall and Robert S. Weisbein

Karin Segall and Robert S. Weisbein Foely & Lardner LLP90 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE FOR COMMUNICATION DEVICES; COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE AND PROGRAMS ENABLING USERS TO PLAY GAMES WITH MOBILE PHONES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND PROGRAMS ENABLING USERS OF COMMUNICATION DEVICES TO SIMULTANEOUSLY ACCESS DATABASES AND GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS; SOFTWARE ENABLING TRANSFER OF DATA BETWEEN MOBILE COMMUNICATION APPARATUS; VIRTUAL REALITY GAME SOFTWARE; DATA CARDS CONTAINING COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE.SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
028HAND HELD UNIT FOR PLAYING ELECTRONIC GAMES; HAND HELD UNIT FOR PLAYING VIDEO GAMES; MOBILE PHONE CONTROLLED TOY VEHICLES, DOLLS, KITES AND MODEL PLANES.SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
041ENTERTAINMENT, NAMELY PROVIDING COMPUTER GAMES TO MOBILE PHONES AND COMPUTERS; PROVIDING ONLINE COMPUTER GAMES VIA NETWORK BETWEEN COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS AND COMPUTERS.SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 10, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 16, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 29, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 29, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2013INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 11, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 25, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 18, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 18, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 10, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 14, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 20, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 30, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 2, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 28, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 21, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 17, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 14, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 3, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 29, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 13, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 12, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 2005AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 5, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2004IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Oct 29, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 30, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 3, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance