USPTO serial 79001896
MULTICOOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MULTICOOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Flexographic printing machines and components thereof; intaglio printing machines and components thereof; printing machines for plastic films, paper, textiles, aluminum foils and laminates and combinations of these materials; machines for the production of bags and sacks of paper, lactic film and combinations of these materials, machines with or without separate drive for the palletizing and depalletizing of bag and sack stacks; bagging and packaging machines; industrial robots, manipulators and components thereof with or without separate drive; film extrusion machines in the nature of lines for the production of blown films and cast films; coating and laminating machines for industrial use and components thereof | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Electronic apparatus, namely computers for regulating and controlling flexographic printing machines; electronic apparatus, namely computers for controlling and regulating intaglio printing machines; electronic apparatus, namely computers for controlling and regulating printing machines for plastic films, paper, textiles, aluminum foils and laminates and combinations of these materials; electronic apparatus, namely computes for controlling and regulating machines for the production of bags and sacks made of paper, plastic film and combinations of these materials; electronic apparatus, namely computers for controlling and regulating machines with or without separate drive for the palletizing and depalletizing of bag and sack stacks; electronic apparatus, namely computers for controlling and regulating bagging and packaging machines; electronic apparatus, namely computers for controlling and regulating industrial robots, manipulators and components thereof with or without separate drive; electronic apparatus, namely computers for controlling and regulating film extrusion machines in the nature of lines for the production of blown films and cast films; electronic apparatus, namely computers for controlling and regulating coating and laminating machines for industrial use and components thereof | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2011 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 13, 2005 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |