Drawing for ECE

USPTO serial 79001928

ECE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3068355Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 14, 2006
Examiner
JACKSON, STEVEN W
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with ECE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Hui Zhang

Hui Zhang RABIN & BERDO, P.C.8150 Leesburg Pike, Suite 800Vienna, VA 22182United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029[ Meat products; meat extracts; broth; bouillons; shellfish (not live); crustaceans (not live); dried, cooked, smoked, preserved and deep-frozen meat and fish; dried, preserved, deep-frozen vegetables, vegetables juices for cooking purposes; preserved pea, preserved lentil, preserved bean, preserved soya bean for food; ] preserved olives, [ pickles; milk products, namely, cheese, yoghurts containing fruits, cream, milk beverages (milk predominating); ] edible oils and fats, namely, olive oil, [ hazelnut oil, corn oil, soya oil, cotton oil, peanut oil, walnut oil, margarine, butter; cooked, preserved and deep-frozen fruits; jams, marmalades, compotes; food supplements for non-medical purposes mainly consisting of proteins and fats combined with vitamins, carbonic hydrates, amino acids, trace elements, pollen preparations; tomato paste ]ACTIVE—
030[ Tapioca, sago, spaghetti, macaroni, ravioli, noodles; honey, royal jelly for human consumption, propolis for human consumption, molasses for food, sauces (condiments), salad dressings, mayonnaise, ketchup, vinegars, spices, tomato sauce, aromatic preparations for food, flour, rice, bulgur (boiled and pounded wheat), malt extracts for food ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
032[ Beers, preparations for making beer, fruit and vegetables juice, syrups and preparations for making syrups, fruit and vegetable extracts, beverages containing fruit and vegetable extracts, beverages made with cola extracts, must, tomato juice, fruit beverages in the form of granules and powder, isotonic beverages ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 11, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 1, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 13, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2023RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 30, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 24, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 21, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 21, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 21, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 18, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 21, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 6, 2013RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 7, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 7, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 201271.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 6, 2012EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2012PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Jun 11, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 14, 201271AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Mar 14, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 18, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 18, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 10, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 14, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 20, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 30, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 2, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 1, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 28, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 6, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 6, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 22, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 9, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 11, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 17, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 14, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 10, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance