Drawing for ALMAR

USPTO serial 79002025

ALMAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3063802Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 28, 2006
Examiner
MURRAY, DAVID T
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALMAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrzej Malarz

111 Brittany CourtClifton, NJ 07013United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Fish and fish products, namely, fish fillets, preserved fish, salted fish, canned fish, smoked fishSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 11, 2026C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 4, 2025EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jul 4, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 4, 2025EWORTEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 4, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 4, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 4, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 4, 2025COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 2, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 2, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
May 2, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 17, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 2, 201671AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Feb 2, 2016MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2014REINREINSTATED—
Nov 18, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 7, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 27, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 8, 2013INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 8, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 19, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Jan 28, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Jan 28, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 28, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 6, 2011715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Dec 6, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 19, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 3, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 25, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 28, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 6, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 16, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 3, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 14, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 13, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 13, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 5, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 4, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 4, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 4, 2005ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 23, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 25, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 25, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 21, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 9, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 14, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 13, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance