USPTO serial 79002104
JOOST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3365979Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 8, 2008
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JOOST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Boost Juice Holdings Pty Ltd ACN 102 379 591
AU
Other trademarks owned by Boost Juice Holdings Pty Ltd ACN 102 379 591
Boost Juice Holdings Pty Ltd ACN 102 379 591
ASHBURTON VIC 3147, AU
Other trademarks owned by Boost Juice Holdings Pty Ltd ACN 102 379 591
Boost Juice Holdings Pty Ltd ACN 102 379 591
ASHBURTON VIC 3147, AU
Other trademarks owned by Boost Juice Holdings Pty Ltd ACN 102 379 591
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph D. Lewis
Joseph D. Lewis Barnes & Thornburg LLP750 17th Street, NWSuite 900Washington, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Fruit and vegetable based nutritional drinks and smoothies | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 043 | Fast food restaurants and restaurant services featuring vitamin and nutrition based fruit and vegetable juices, fruit dairy drinks, including those containing natural energy and vitamin supplement, as well as nutritional fruit and vegetable based foods | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Boost Juice Holdings Pty Ltd ACN 102 379 591
- Other trademarks owned by Boost Juice Holdings Pty Ltd ACN 102 379 591
- Other trademarks owned by Boost Juice Holdings Pty Ltd ACN 102 379 591
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named JOOST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 4, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS NOT UPDATED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2010 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 7, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 4, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 11, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 11, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |