Drawing for LIFEWORKS

USPTO serial 79002140

LIFEWORKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3035899Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 27, 2005
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIFEWORKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN Abelman Frayne & Schwab666 Third Avenue 10th FloorNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Technical consultancy regarding the setting up of telecommunication systems and telecommunication networksSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Development, planning and design engineering of telecommunication and information processing services and facilities and telecommunications networks and pertinent facilitiesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 18, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 19, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 19, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 14, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 5, 2013INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 5, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 6, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 28, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 16, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 16, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 3, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 27, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 10, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 21, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 21, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 4, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 20, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 17, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 13, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 11, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 31, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 31, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 30, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 13, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 18, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 20, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 20, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance