USPTO serial 79002209
SNOW SCOOT BICYCLE SNOW MACHINE DISTRIBUTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3029263Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 13, 2005
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SNOW SCOOT BICYCLE SNOW MACHINE DISTRIBUTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Franck Petoud
- Other trademarks owned by Franck Petoud
- Other trademarks owned by Franck Petoud
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named SNOW SCOOT BICYCLE SNOW MACHINE DISTRIBUTION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2011 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 1, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 10, 2005 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 6, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 31, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |