USPTO serial 79002307
FREEWAVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MURRAY, DAVID T
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FREEWAVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data acquisition system comprised of computer hardware and computer software for use in the automatic integrated control of Magnetic Resonance Imaging apparatus, magnetic gradient coils, spectrometers, table movement, graphical user interface software and Internet-enabled communications protocols | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | Medical magnetic resonance imaging apparatus | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 28, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 17, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 17, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2006 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 10, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2005 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 4, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |