Drawing for GRIMAC

USPTO serial 79002371

GRIMAC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3050958Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 24, 2006
Examiner
DAWE III, WILLIAM H
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRIMAC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-packaged coffee pods for making coffee; vending machinesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
011[ Electric coffee roasters, ] paper filters for electric coffee makers, electric coffee percolatorsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jun 26, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 8, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Mar 18, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Apr 24, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jul 24, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jul 24, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jul 24, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun 5, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
May 31, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Aug 27, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Aug 19, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 28, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 11, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 11, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 5, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 24, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 29, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 3, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Nov 3, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 1, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 12, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 17, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 22, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 15, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 5, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 4, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 30, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 29, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jan 27, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 27, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 19, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 19, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jan 19, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 9, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 1, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 3, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jun 3, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance