Drawing for GRIMAC

USPTO serial 79002371

GRIMAC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3050958Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 24, 2006
Examiner
DAWE III, WILLIAM H
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRIMAC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael M. Ballard

Michael M. Ballard Workman Nydegger60 East South TempleSuite 1000SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-packaged coffee pods for making coffee; vending machinesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
011[ Electric coffee roasters, ] paper filters for electric coffee makers, electric coffee percolatorsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 8, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 18, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 24, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 24, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 5, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 31, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 19, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 28, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 11, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 11, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 5, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 24, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 29, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 3, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 3, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 1, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 12, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 17, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 22, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 15, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 4, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 30, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 27, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 27, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 19, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 1, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 3, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance