USPTO serial 79002424
LOVE JEANS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3485055Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 12, 2008
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LOVE JEANS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DE
DE
DE
DE
CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James L. Scott, Charles E. Burpee, Janet P. Knaus, William P. Dani, Chad E. Kleinheksel, R. Scott Keller, Norbert F. Kugele, Jeffrey A. Nelson, and Gregory P. Bondarenko
JAMES L SCOTT WARNER NORCROSS & JUDD LLP900 FIFTH 3RD CTR111 LYON ST NWGRAND RAPIDS, MI 49503Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | LEATHER AND IMITATION LEATHER GOODS, NAMELY, CASES, BAGS; WALLETS, BRIEF CASES, CREDIT CARD CASES, PASSPORT CASES, BUSINESS CARD CASES, CALLING CARD CASES, CARRYING CASES, DOCUMENT CASES, TRAVELING CASES, VANITY CASES SOLD EMPTY, CASES FOR KEYS, LEATHER FOR SHOES, HANDBAGS, LEATHER KEY CHAINS, PURSES, SPORTS BAGS, LEATHER SHOPPING BAGS, STRAPS, AND LUGGAGE; LEATHER SOLD IN BULK; SUITCASES | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, BLOUSES, SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, SWEAT-SHIRTS, JACKETS, PULLOVERS, TANK-TOPS, CROP TOPS, HALTER TOPS, TOPS,TROUSERS, SKIRTS, BATHING COSTUMES FOR WOMEN, FOLK COSTUMES, COSTUMES FOR USE IN ROLE-PLAYING GAMES, DANCE COSTUMES, FITTED SWIMMING COSTUMES WITH BRA CUPS, HALLOWEEN COSTUMES AND MASKS SOLD IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, MASQUERADE COSTUMES AND MASKS SOLD IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, COATS, UNDERWEAR, BATHING SUITS,BATHING COSTUMES, SUITS, JOGGING PANTS, JOGGING SUITS, BIKINIS, SCARVES, GLOVES, BELTS AND TIES; FOOTWEAR; HEADGEAR, NAMELY, HATS, HEADBANDS, CAPS, AND BANDANNAS | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Love Jeans GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Love Jeans GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Love Jeans GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by No Angels Mode GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Magic Clothing Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named LOVE JEANS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2023 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2023 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2016 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 13, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 4, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 27, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 11, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 1, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 19, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |