Drawing for SCINTILLA

USPTO serial 79002452

SCINTILLA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3158846Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 17, 2006
Examiner
STRASER, RICHARD
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCINTILLA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Milena S. Dakova-Micheva

MILENA S DAKOVA-MICHEVA GRAHAM CAMPAIGN PCTHE BAR BLDG36 W 44TH STNEW YORK, NY 10036-8178

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Precious metals and their alloys; jewelry of precious metals and their alloys; loose precious and semi-precious gemstones, diamonds; timepieces and chronometrical instruments; all goods are not sold in the wholesale channels of tradeSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 24, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 13, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 8, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 5, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 17, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 5, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 27, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 6, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 15, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 9, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 17, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 25, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 5, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 2, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 2, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 19, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 18, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 17, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 17, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 8, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 4, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 3, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 1, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 10, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance