USPTO serial 79002469
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The Recovery Company Pty Ltd ACN 106 350 930
AU
Other trademarks owned by The Recovery Company Pty Ltd ACN 106 350 930
The Recovery Company Pty Ltd ACN 106 350 930
AU
Other trademarks owned by The Recovery Company Pty Ltd ACN 106 350 930
The Recovery Company Pty Ltd ACN 106 350 930
AU
Other trademarks owned by The Recovery Company Pty Ltd ACN 106 350 930
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | non-alcoholic drinks, namely, energy drinks, isotonic beverages, hypotonic beverages, effervescent beverages, preparations for making non-alcoholic drinks; mineral and aerated water; fruit drinks and fruit juices | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 7, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 7, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 3, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |