USPTO serial 79002496
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
BHS Corrugated Maschinen- und Anlagenbau GmbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by BHS Corrugated Maschinen- und Anlagenbau GmbH
BHS Corrugated Maschinen- und Anlagenbau GmbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by BHS Corrugated Maschinen- und Anlagenbau GmbH
BHS Corrugated Maschinen- und Anlagenbau GmbH
Weiherhammer, DE
Other trademarks owned by BHS Corrugated Maschinen- und Anlagenbau GmbH
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINES FOR THE MANUFACTURE AND TREATMENT OF CORRUGATED BOARD AND PARTS OF THESE MACHINES, STEEL CORRUGATING ROLLS USED TO TREAT AND CORRUGATE PAPER OR CARDBOARD | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2026 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 25, 2025 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2024 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 3, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2021 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jul 3, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 3, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2015 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 14, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |