Drawing for TITRESSENCE

USPTO serial 79002544

TITRESSENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3046263Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 17, 2006
Examiner
REGAN, JOHN B
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TITRESSENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics, cream and liquid soaps for body and face, essential oils for personal use, plant extracts used as ingredients for cosmetic purposes, namely for creams for body and face, gels for body and face, milks for body and face and lotions for body and face; face and body beauty creams, beauty gels, face and body milks, beauty milks, face and body lotions, skin lotions, pomades and preparations for body care; hair lotions, shampoosSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
005Pharmaceutical, veterinary and sanitary products for medical use containing plant extracts for the treatment of loss of vitality and loss of stamina, stress, sleep troubles, depression, articular pains, acne, and aiming at improving hormonal balance, blood circulation, slimness, detoxication, digestion, aging skin, stretch marks, skin firming and tonifying and sun protection, and aiming at fighting exposure to free radicals; vitamins and dietetic substances in the nature of capsules and pills, both adapted for medical use for the treatment of loss of vitality and loss of stamina, stress, sleep troubles, depression, pain, and aimed at improving hormonal balance, blood circulation, slimness, detoxication, digestion, and aimed at fighting exposure to free radicalsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 30, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jul 24, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jul 24, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 10, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Mar 26, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jan 4, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 26, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Oct 5, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 1, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 1, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 10, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 17, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 10, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 25, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 5, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 12, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 11, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 4, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 16, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 2, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 2, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jun 2, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Apr 4, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 4, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 7, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 16, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 26, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 10, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jun 10, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance