CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for JC JUS ET COMMERCIUM

USPTO serial 79002566

JC JUS ET COMMERCIUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3158847Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 17, 2006
Examiner
SMITH, REBECCA A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JC JUS ET COMMERCIUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith R. Obert

Keith R. Obert Ware, Fressola, Maguire & Barber LLP755 Main Street, Bldg. 5P.O. Box 224Monroe, CT 06468

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business organisation consultancy; professional business consultancy; business administration; market research and market analysis; accounting services; business auditing servicesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
041[ Provision of training relating to law and to the provision of legal services; provision of training relating to revenue; training services relating to law; arranging and conducting of educational conferences, exhibitions and seminars for cultural purposes; publication of texts, reports, papers and books ]SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—
042Legal services; legal research services; arbitration services; research and professional consultancy relating to intellectual property and industrial propertySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 14, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 2, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 29, 2018XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2018XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jan 19, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 26, 2017ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
May 19, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 27, 2017EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2016PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Sep 30, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 31, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 4, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
May 4, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Dec 4, 2014INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 4, 2014LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2014COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Mar 20, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 21, 2014LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 15, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Nov 4, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 16, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 15, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 9, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 25, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 5, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 26, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 22, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 19, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 2006AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
May 8, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 17, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 22, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 23, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 10, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance