USPTO serial 79002568
BERTI PAVIMENTI LEGNO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3055548Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 31, 2006
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BERTI PAVIMENTI LEGNO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BERTI PAVIMENTI LEGNO SNC DI BERTI GIANCARLO & C.
I-35010 VILLA DEL CONTE (PD), IT
Other trademarks owned by BERTI PAVIMENTI LEGNO SNC DI BERTI GIANCARLO & C.
BERTI PAVIMENTI LEGNO SNC DI BERTI GIANCARLO & C.
I-35010 VILLA DEL CONTE (PD), IT
Other trademarks owned by BERTI PAVIMENTI LEGNO SNC DI BERTI GIANCARLO & C.
BERTI PAVIMENTI LEGNO SNC DI BERTI GIANCARLO & C.
I-35010 VILLA DEL CONTE (PD), IT
Other trademarks owned by BERTI PAVIMENTI LEGNO SNC DI BERTI GIANCARLO & C.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Non metallic building materials, namely wood boards and panels; non-metallic rigid pipes for building; non-metallic transportable buildings | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BERTI PAVIMENTI LEGNO SNC DI BERTI GIANCARLO & C.
- Other trademarks owned by BERTI PAVIMENTI LEGNO SNC DI BERTI GIANCARLO & C.
- Other trademarks owned by BERTI PAVIMENTI LEGNO SNC DI BERTI GIANCARLO & C.
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named BERTI PAVIMENTI LEGNO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 5, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 5, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2011 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2011 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 10, 2005 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 11, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| May 20, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |