USPTO serial 79002656
ARTPRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ADKINS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARTPRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Dolls' clothes, toys, novelties for parties, dances [party favors], toy masks, practical jokes [novelties], Christmas trees (ornaments for -) [except illumination articles and confectionery], plush toys, soap bubbles (toys), building blocks (toys), spinning tops (toys) | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2014 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |