USPTO serial 79002665
PICKWICK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3158848Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 17, 2006
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PICKWICK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | [ Coffee, coffee-based beverages, coffee beverages with milk, coffee extracts, instant coffee, coffee substitutes; mixtures of coffee and coffee substitutes; mixtures of coffee and milk powder; mixtures of coffee, milk powder and coffee substitutes; mixtures of coffee, cereals, fruit and spices; tea, tea-based beverages, tea extracts, tea substitutes; cocoa, cocoa-based beverages, chocolate and chocolate extracts in powder, granulated or liquid form; all aforementioned products being dietetic foodstuffs and beverages for medical use ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 029 | [ Meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams; compotes; eggs, edible oils and fats ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | [ Coffee, also coffee in filter packing, coffee-based beverages, coffee beverages with milk, coffee extracts, instant coffee, coffee substitutes, mixtures of coffee and coffee substitutes; mixtures of coffee and milk powder, mixtures of coffee, milk powder and coffee substitutes; coffee containing cereals, fruit and spices; ] tea, tea-based beverages, instant tea, tea extracts, tea substitutes; [ cocoa, cocoa-based beverages, chocolate and chocolate extracts in powder, granulated or liquid form; sugar, rice, tapioca, sago; flour and preparations made from cereals, bread, biscuits, cakes; pastry and confectionery, namely, candies, fruit jellies, mints and chewing gum; ices, namely, flavored ices; honey, treacle; yeast; baking-powder; salt, mustard; pepper, vinegar, sauces, spices; ice ] | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | [ Mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks, namely, aerated waters; carbonated water; mineral waters; spring waters; flavored waters; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups and other preparations for making beverages, namely, non-alcoholic carbonated and non-carbonated drinks, namely, soft drinks and lemonade ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sara Lee/DE N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Sara Lee/DE N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Sara Lee/DE N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Douwe Egberts B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named PICKWICK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 30, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 23, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 22, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2015 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 15, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2005 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2005 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |