USPTO serial 79002691
VITEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VITEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific, nautical, surveying, electric, photographic, cinematographic, optical, weighing, measuring, signalling, checking (supervision), life-saving and teaching apparatus and instruments; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; magnetic data carriers, recording discs; automatic vending machines and mechanisms for coin-operated apparatus; cash registers, calculating machines, data processing equipment and computers; fire-extinguishing apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Apparatus for lighting, heating, steam generating, cooking, refrigerating, drying, ventilating, water supply and sanitary purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Household or kitchen utensils and containers (not of precious metal or coated therewith); unworked or semi-worked glass (except glass used in building); glassware, porcelain and earthenware not included in other classes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OOO "Business-Aliance"
- Other trademarks owned by MERLION INVESTMENTS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by OOO "GOLDER-ELECTRONICS"
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named VITEK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2024 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 17, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 10, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |