USPTO serial 79002781
LIV NATUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3168823Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 7, 2006
- Examiner
- AGOSTO, GISELLE MARIE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIV NATUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Potato crisps, apple chips, fruit chips, vegetable chips, health snack, namely, fruit, berry and vegetable based snack food | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | breakfast cereals; maize chips; muesli chips; chips mainly based on cereals; muesli; bread; confectionery, namely, candy; condiments, namely natural flavors, namely food flavorings, chocolate | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 031 | agricultural and horticultural products and grains, namely unprocessed oats | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Mineral and aerated waters and other non alcoholic drinks, namely, soft drinks, fruit drinks and fruit juices, syrups and other preparations, namely powders and concentrates for making beverages, namely, fruit drinks, berry drinks, oats drinks | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Liv Natur AB
- Other trademarks owned by Juristfirman Pålsson&Pålsson HB
- Other trademarks owned by Juristfirman Pålsson&Pålsson HB
- Other trademarks owned by Juristfirman Pålsson&Pålsson HB
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named LIV NATUR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2014 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 2, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2005 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2005 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2005 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 14, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |