Drawing for KRATZMAIER KONSTRUKTIONEN

USPTO serial 79002791

KRATZMAIER KONSTRUKTIONEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3148831Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 26, 2006
Examiner
MANDIR, FREDERICK
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KRATZMAIER KONSTRUKTIONEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007electromotive linear actuators; electromotive rotary actuators; robotic devices for handling and transporting goods and packagesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
010medical equipment, namely, cutting machines for cutting bandages; medical equipment, namely, cutting machines for cutting clothes of trauma victims; medical equipment, namely, motorized beds for holding and moving patients during medical treatmentsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
042mechanical engineering; electrical engineeringSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 5, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Nov 21, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 21, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 7, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jul 14, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Apr 30, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Aug 30, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
May 2, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 17, 2007FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE
May 1, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 1, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Apr 26, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 26, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 6, 2006OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 4, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 15, 2006OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jun 15, 2006OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 14, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 17, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 21, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 18, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 18, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Apr 18, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Apr 18, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Apr 18, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Apr 3, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Feb 24, 2006ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED
Jun 22, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 20, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 17, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 13, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
May 10, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
May 10, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
May 9, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 9, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 6, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 12, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 27, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 13, 2005CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Nov 24, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 25, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jun 24, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance