Drawing for CABINETMAKER

USPTO serial 79002808

CABINETMAKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LEE, DOUGLAS
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CABINETMAKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008screw drivers; mitre saws; utility knives; replacement blades for utility knives; hack saws; hammers; hand operated sealant guns; hand operated guns for the extrusion of mastics; hand operated tools, namely routers; parts for hand operated routers, namely router bitsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2014DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Oct 10, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Apr 22, 2011CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 25, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Oct 9, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 7, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 25, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 6, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 9, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jun 9, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 19, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 5, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 5, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 24, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Nov 24, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 6, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 6, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 28, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 6, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 6, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 6, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 12, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 6, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 25, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jun 24, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance