USPTO serial 79002816
RÉCOLTE 2002 CHOCOLAT NOIR DE DOMAINE AMPAMAKIA PLANTATION MILLOT ORIGINE MADAGASCAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3082924Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 18, 2006
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- PRE-EXAMINATION SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RÉCOLTE 2002 CHOCOLAT NOIR DE DOMAINE AMPAMAKIA PLANTATION MILLOT ORIGINE MADAGASCAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SONAFI, société par actions simplifiée
FR
Other trademarks owned by SONAFI, société par actions simplifiée
SONAFI, société par actions simplifiée
FR
Other trademarks owned by SONAFI, société par actions simplifiée
SONAFI, société par actions simplifiée
FR
Other trademarks owned by SONAFI, société par actions simplifiée
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristin H. Altoff
Kristin H. Altoff MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP1111 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.; Attn: TMSUWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Cocoa; chocolate; confectionary products, namely, chocolates and candies | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SONAFI, société par actions simplifiée
- Other trademarks owned by SONAFI, société par actions simplifiée
- Other trademarks owned by SONAFI, société par actions simplifiée
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named RÉCOLTE 2002 CHOCOLAT NOIR DE DOMAINE AMPAMAKIA PLANTATION MILLOT ORIGINE MADAGASCAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 25, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 18, 2015 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 12, 2011 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Apr 23, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2007 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 24, 2005 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2005 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |